Every spring, researchers from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) and the Prince William Sound Science Center (PWSSC) work together to estimate the spawning biomass of Pacific herring in Prince William Sound (PWS). This project is part of a greater effort by the Herring Research and Monitoring program to track the recovery of herring since its decline in 1993. Spawning biomass, the mass of the entire spawning population, is calculated using two methods in PWS. The original method of aerial surveys was improved upon when PWSSC researcher Jay Kirsch, along with John Wilcock, Gary Thomas, and Kevin Stokesbury came up with the hydroacoustic survey method in the early 1990s. Dick Thorne carried on the program for many years until Dr. Pete Rand took over. Since then, the program has used both methods: aerial surveys for their ability to cover a lot of ground and acoustic surveys to look deeper. The results tend to reinforce each other.
Acoustic surveys, headed up by PWSSC research ecologist Pete Rand, are usually done in two parts: first in the eastern sound including Ports Gravina and Fidalgo, and later in the western sound near Montague Island. About three or four nights of surveying are done in each region.
On a typical cruise, researchers spend the day looking for signs of herring in the area. At 30 to 40 meters deep, it’s not easy to see a school of herring from a boat, so predatory activity is the best indicator. Whales, sea lions, diving birds, gulls, and eagles all turn out for the feast when herring are around.
Once the researchers have found fish, they wait until nightfall to do the acoustic survey. At night, herring tend to rise off the bottom and spread out, allowing more accurate readings from the acoustic survey technology. Around 11:00 p.m. the researchers, working under red-filtered lights (deck lights are turned off for stealth), lower a transducer connected to an aluminum tow-fin into the water alongside the boat. This transducer works much like a fish finder or sonar on a boat, sending sonar wave (sound wave) “pings” down into the water. When the wave hits something and bounces back it contains information on the size and depth of the object it hit. Once an echo is received at the transducer, a digital signal is passed through the cable to an on-board computer where the data is saved. An echogram display on the computer allows the researchers to observe patterns in herring schools as the vessel makes its way through the transects.
The sonar that Pete uses is a scientific echosounder that has a narrow beam and high sensitivity. The system is carefully calibrated on each cruise, so the resulting data is collected consistently every year. With the transducer in the water, the researchers begin slow zig-zag transects in the area where they suspect the fish are aggregating.
Surveys typically last four to five hours, enough time to cover the entire aggregation area, which is often well defined by the patterns that researchers see on the echogram, and the spatial patterns of the predators that were observed the day prior to the survey.
The downside of using acoustic survey to estimate biomass is that it doesn’t tell you for certain what species of fish you are picking up. Pete usually has a good idea based on the shape of the school and the location of the fish. But to double check, ADF&G does “ground-truthing” by catching a very small sample of the fish for identification. Each fish is identified by species and later measured for length, identified as male or female, and aged by markings in their scales that are similar to tree rings.
The main goal of the acoustic monitoring project is to find out how many thousands of metric tons of herring are in the sound for ADF&G’s stock assessment models, but the data is also used to look at distribution changes. “There has been a shift,” Pete observed. “There used to be a lot more fish in the western part of the sound, now most of them are spawning in the eastern part of the sound. Sometimes there are herring spread across several bays, but in recent years we’re only finding fish in Gravina.” Over the years since the project started, the time series has shown that there were a lot more fish in the late 1990s and it has been going down in recent years. “Our estimate in 2016 was the lowest recorded since the acoustic surveys began in 1993 (about 3,000 metric tons). Last year was a little higher, but I don’t know what to expect this year. Especially with the marine heat wave we experienced in recent years, all bets are off.”
It is important to keep in mind this is one of the many research projects in the Herring Research and Monitoring Program. Along with the abundance monitoring (both acoustic and aerial surveys) there are ongoing projects examining the role of disease and infection on herring survival, determining at what age herring first start spawning and developing better assessment models to describe the trends we are observing. We still struggle with explaining exactly why the herring declined in the first place and what is preventing their recovery in Prince William Sound. Answers don’t come easy, and as Pete points out, “These fish are obviously coping with a lot in the Sound, including a marine heat wave, predators, and finding food. They do seem to be between a rock and a hard place. Being out on the water and collecting data like we do every spring definitely helps us work toward some answers.”
Recommended reading to learn more about the research projects referenced in this article:
Herring Research and Monitoring
Adult Biomass Surveys
Aerial Spawn Surveys
Boom and Busted: Lessons from Alaska’s Mysterious Herring Collapse
Scales as Growth History